The parenting strategy that works by doing almost no correcting

Medium - Requires some preparation Recommended

Lou Herbert had a boardroom mutiny on his hands. Five of his six top executives had just quit, calling him a tyrant, and the one he missed most was Kate Stenarude, the woman everyone had assumed would eventually run the company. Herbert couldn't figure out why people had followed her so completely when they'd resisted him at every turn, until Yusuf al-Falah drew a pyramid on a whiteboard and asked him to look again.

The pyramid has two zones. The top, tiny sliver is labeled dealing with things that are going wrong, correcting, disciplining, punishing. The much larger area beneath it is helping things go right, broken into building relationships, listening and learning, and teaching and communicating, all resting on the deepest layer of all: getting your own heart out of the box. Most people, al-Falah says, spend nearly all their time and energy at the top, correcting, when the pyramid argues almost all of it belongs at the bottom.

Herbert realizes he'd removed a ladder from Kate's sales floor because he thought her incentive idea was silly, a small act of correction that, Kate had told him at the time, spoke volumes about the atmosphere she was managing under. Kate, by contrast, parked at the far end of the lot, helped the janitorial staff clean the cafeteria when they were shorthanded, and treated temps the same way she treated Herbert. She'd spent her time on the bottom of the pyramid without ever having to name it, which is exactly why people who worked for her rarely needed correcting.

Another parent in the group, Pettis, admits he's been trying to correct his daughter by badmouthing her friends and restricting her time with them, and it hasn't worked. Al-Falah asks whether Pettis actually knows what she likes about those friends, or how the divorce has affected her, or whether he's spent time building the relationship at all before trying to legislate her choices. Pettis doesn't have good answers.

The pyramid's warning is that correction which isn't backed by relationship, listening, and teaching below it usually fails, and doubling down on correction when it fails only makes things worse. Herbert leaves the session already planning to drive a ladder to Kate's house in Connecticut, because sometimes the return trip has to happen before the conversation can.

Take stock of where your time actually goes with the person you're trying to influence, and if most of it is spent correcting, disciplining, or arguing about what's wrong, start deliberately shifting weight toward building the relationship, listening, and teaching instead. If correction keeps failing no matter how much firmer you get, resist the urge to correct harder and ask instead whether you've genuinely been learning from this person or just delivering more instructions at them. Build relationships with the people who influence them too, not only with them directly. And find one small, symbolic thing you took away or damaged along the way, and reverse it concretely, because sometimes returning an actual ladder does more work than any speech ever could.

What You'll Achieve

You redirect your effort away from repeated correction, which usually isn't working, and toward the deeper layers of relationship, listening, and teaching that actually make people willing to change, so your influence increases even as your visible corrections decrease.

Work the bottom of the pyramid first

1

Spend more time below correction than on it.

For every hour spent correcting, disciplining, or arguing about what's wrong, spend more building the relationship, listening, and teaching.

2

If correction keeps failing, look one level down instead of correcting harder.

Ask whether you've genuinely been listening to and learning from the person, or just delivering more instructions.

3

Build relationships with the people who influence them, not only with them directly.

A parent, spouse, or close friend of the person you're trying to reach often has more leverage than you do alone.

4

Return the symbolic thing you took away.

Identify one small act that damaged trust and reverse it concretely, since a real gesture can matter more than any speech.

Reflection Questions

  • Where does most of your time and energy actually go with the person you're trying to influence: correcting, or building?
  • If correction has been failing, what would it look like to genuinely learn from this person instead of instructing them further?
  • Is there a small, symbolic act of correction you could reverse right now to rebuild trust?

Personalization Tips

  • A manager who removed a team member's pet project rebuilds trust by publicly reinstating and supporting it before asking for anything in return.
  • A parent trying to influence a teenager's friendships starts inviting the friends over instead of forbidding contact with them.
The Anatomy of Peace: Resolving the Heart of Conflict
← Back to Book

The Anatomy of Peace: Resolving the Heart of Conflict

The Arbinger Institute
Insight 8 of 8

Ready to Take Action?

Get the Mentorist app and turn insights like these into daily habits.