Build ownership by extending psychological standing and asking for 100% accountability
A regional call center had a quality problem: repeat calls about the same issue. The operations head, Maya, kept hearing, “That’s the product team’s fault,” or, “Support can’t fix that.” In meetings, shoulders went up, eyes went down, and nothing moved. On a cool Wednesday morning with the HVAC humming, she changed the script. The next stand‑up opened with a slide that read, “Engineers and agents, together,” and she said, “If you touch the customer, you’re in the circle.” It sounded small, but the shift extended permission to act across groups.
Maya then asked for something unusual: “Tell the story as if you’re 100% responsible.” A support lead admitted they never flagged repeat tickets in a way product managers could see. A product manager confessed their team asked for email once and never validated it. Two levers appeared: a second email field with instant validation and a tagging convention for repeat issues. No villains, just handles.
The first week, engineering added email confirmation and a self-serve resend button. Support piloted the new tags and posted a “Top 5 repeats” note on Fridays. Calls about missing confirmations dropped by 40% in ten days. In the kitchen, someone taped a sticky note to the coffee machine: “Move your chair.” Silly, sure, but the tone changed. The wins weren’t spectacular, they were steady. That’s how culture moves—from defensiveness to joint authorship.
Psychologically, this works because people hesitate to act when they feel they lack standing. A simple inclusive label grants legitimacy. The 100% exercise reduces attribution bias and focuses attention on controllable context, not fixed traits. And environment tweaks beat exhortations: change the field, not the person. Ownership grows when people see their fingerprint on the next better version.
Draft one sentence that explicitly invites the people you need—by name, not implication—and put it on the next agenda or channel post. In your next meeting, run a 10‑minute round where each person shares the “I’m 100% responsible” version of the story, and listen for levers you can pull this week. Write a small plan titled “Move Your Chair,” listing two context changes you control and who will do them by Friday. Keep it light and practical. You’ll feel the mood shift once permission and responsibility are shared out loud.
What You'll Achieve
Internally, reduce defensiveness, increase agency, and align identity with shared problem-solving. Externally, implement two context changes that measurably reduce a repeat issue within two weeks.
Grant permission then claim responsibility
Explicitly invite unlikely allies
Add language that widens the circle: “Students and staff,” “Men and women,” “Parents and neighbors.” This grants psychological standing to act.
Run the 100% story exercise
In a tense situation, have each person tell the story as if they were 100% responsible for the current state. This surfaces levers without blame.
Write your “move your chair” plan
List two controllable actions you can take in the next week to change the context, not the person (e.g., tweak the form, change seating, add a pre-brief).
Reflection Questions
- Who needs explicit permission to join this effort?
- If I owned 100% of this outcome, what two levers would I pull?
- Which context change could remove friction without requiring heroics?
- How will we recognize and celebrate shared wins?
Personalization Tips
- Campus safety: Invite men explicitly into anti-harassment efforts with “Students of all genders stand up together.”
- Team conflict: Each peer writes a “my 100%” paragraph before mediation so solutions focus on levers, not labels.
Upstream: The Quest to Solve Problems Before They Happen
Ready to Take Action?
Get the Mentorist app and turn insights like these into daily habits.