Surround yourself with truth-seekers who reward honesty over ego

Medium - Requires some preparation Recommended

A CEO was sure she made the right call firing her sales VP—until revenues cratered and competitors ate her market share. In a panic, she blamed the market, then second-guessed herself, then tried overcorrecting. It went from bad to worse. When she joined a decision pod that prized accuracy over ego, she got an epiphany. Every meeting began with a simple rule: “Don’t praise results—grade the process.” They held her accountable by rewarding honest questions and detailed critiques instead of applause for big wins. Slowly, meetings went from pep rallies into surgical labs, dissecting every choice and data point. In six months she stopped chasing shiny outcomes and started executing ruthless decision hygiene—and revenues rebounded.

Her story isn’t unique. Whether in finance, tech, or the nonprofit world, the smartest teams aren’t staffed with cheerleaders. They’re built on CUDOS—communal data, universalist standards, disinterested reviewers, and organized skepticism. That means treating dissent as a gift, not a threat.

When your team commits to wrestling with every assumption, celebrating uncomfortable feedback, and requiring full data sharing, you flip the script. You stop falling for motivated reasoning and start seeing reality. That lifts every decision to a higher bar.

Gather your squad and lay out the ground rules: no hiding data, no shooting the messenger, no casual agreement for its own sake. Every lost deal, every missed deadline is an opportunity—so bring it to the table for open dissection. Keep your next meeting’s timer set: thirty minutes of analysis, ten minutes for solutions. Notice how discomfort turns into breakthroughs when everyone knows they’ll be praised for honesty, not just results. Try it at your next debrief—watch your team’s blind spots peel away.

What You'll Achieve

You’ll foster a high-trust culture where people freely challenge each other, learn from every outcome, and steadily upgrade decision processes. You’ll see fewer repeat mistakes and more consistent, data-driven wins.

Build a group that craves accuracy

1

Pick three truth-seekers

Identify three people who aren’t afraid to challenge you—maybe a coworker, a friend, or a mentor. Ask if you can test decisions with them in private sessions.

2

Define your pact

Set group rules: praise questions over answers, require sharing all data, and reward dissent as much as agreement. Write these norms down so everyone has clear expectations.

3

Host monthly debriefs

Meet once a month—online or in person—to workshop recent decisions. Start each session by recalling the pact, then rotate roles: devil’s advocate, questioner, and observer.

Reflection Questions

  • Who on your team would push back hardest if you asked them to?
  • What patterns emerge when you invite dissent instead of applause?
  • How can you reward a team member next week for surfacing a tough blind spot?

Personalization Tips

  • A sales team could form a monthly lab to dissect lost deals without finger-pointing.
  • Parenting partners can meet weekly and invite a grandparent to play devil’s advocate on discipline plans.
  • A writing group might critique each other’s drafts by first summarizing every strength, then challenging one weak spot.
Thinking in Bets: Making Smarter Decisions When You Don't Have All the Facts
← Back to Book

Thinking in Bets: Making Smarter Decisions When You Don't Have All the Facts

Annie Duke 2018
Insight 4 of 8

Ready to Take Action?

Get the Mentorist app and turn insights like these into daily habits.