Stop gossip loops and make peer conflict resolution your default

Medium - Requires some preparation Recommended

A manager noticed their 1:1s turning into vent sessions. People complained about peers, got sympathy, and left feeling a little better. Nothing changed. The manager’s afternoons disappeared into shuttle diplomacy. One Wednesday, after a particularly long gripe about handoffs, they said, “Let’s bring them in now.” The complainer blinked. Ten minutes later, three people sat down, and the air felt different—warmer, but real.

The manager set a simple frame: “You both want fewer dropped balls and faster turnaround. Let’s each propose one change you can own this week.” One agreed to post daily status by noon, the other to define ‘ready’ criteria in the ticket. They set a check‑in for next Tuesday. The manager didn’t declare a winner, they just kept the conversation specific and future‑focused. The next week, the heat was lower and the work moved.

To prevent future pileups, the manager added a ‘duty to dissent’ role in weekly planning. A rotating teammate had to poke holes in the plan. Arguments happened in the open, while decisions were still cheap to change. Gossip traffic dropped. People started walking to each other’s desks before walking into the manager’s office.

Conflict isn’t a bug, it’s information. But when it flows through private channels, it grows sharper and less useful. Triads convert heat into adjustments in behavior and process. A ritualized skeptic keeps debates healthy and stops fragility from masquerading as harmony. This approach is grounded in group dynamics research: problems solved where they occur, by the people involved, stick better and last longer.

The next time someone complains about a peer to you, pause and say, “Thanks for raising it—let’s bring them in so we can solve it together.” Facilitate a short triad by naming the shared goal, restating the issue neutrally, and asking each person to propose one concrete change they can own this week. Schedule a quick check‑in to see if it worked. In your next planning meeting, assign a rotating ‘duty to dissent’ so disagreement is expected, not whispered. Try one triad and one skeptic role before the week ends and watch the gossip loops shrink.

What You'll Achieve

Internally, reduce the stress of hidden conflict and the urge to fix everything yourself. Externally, convert complaints into small, owned behavior changes and get faster, cleaner decisions in meetings.

Replace shuttle diplomacy with triads

1

Ban backchannel complaints

When someone complains about a peer, listen briefly, then say, “Let’s bring them in now,” or schedule a three‑way conversation.

2

Facilitate, don’t adjudicate

In the triad, restate the issue neutrally, set a shared goal, and have each person propose one change they can own.

3

Create a ‘duty to dissent’

In key meetings, invite a rotating skeptic to argue the other side, so disagreements surface early and cleanly.

Reflection Questions

  • Which recurring complaint should become a triad this week?
  • How can I set a future‑focused goal both sides can own?
  • Who can play an honest, skillful skeptic in our next meeting?

Personalization Tips

  • Product and Sales: Instead of venting about pricing, the PM and AE meet with you together, align on goals, and each owns a small process change.
  • School staff: Two teachers disagree about grading. You host a short triad, agree on rubrics, and assign a monthly review.
Radical Candor: Be a Kickass Boss Without Losing Your Humanity
← Back to Book

Radical Candor: Be a Kickass Boss Without Losing Your Humanity

Kim Scott 2017
Insight 7 of 8

Ready to Take Action?

Get the Mentorist app and turn insights like these into daily habits.