Famine plague and war just lost their five-thousand-year grip on humanity
Most of us carry an old assumption without examining it: that the world is roughly as hungry, sick and violent as it has always been, so there's no real point celebrating or even discussing progress. Yuval Noah Harari opens his account by showing how far that assumption has drifted from the numbers.
For most of history, a bad harvest or a raiding party could wipe out a village. In 1694, about 2.8 million French people, fifteen percent of the population, starved to death in a single stretch of bad weather and hoarded grain. Plague could kill a third of a city within months, as it did in fourteenth-century Florence. War was simply assumed; nations planned for it the way we plan for weather.
Now look at 2014. More than 2.1 billion people were overweight, compared to 850 million who were malnourished. In 2010, obesity killed about three million people worldwide, while famine and malnutrition combined killed roughly one million. In 2012, war killed about 120,000 people globally and crime another 500,000, while 800,000 people took their own lives and 1.5 million died of diabetes. Sugar, as Harari puts it, is now more dangerous than gunpowder.
This doesn't mean suffering has vanished, and Harari is careful to say so. Hundreds of millions still go hungry, AIDS and malaria still kill by the million, and wars still devastate Syria and the Congo. But these have shifted from being seen as unavoidable cosmic facts to being treated as failures with a cause, something we investigate, something we expect governments to fix.
Which raises the real question Harari is building toward. History, he argues, does not tolerate a vacuum. If famine, plague and war are receding from the top of the human agenda, something else is bound to take their place. His answer, laid out across the rest of the book, is that humanity's next projects are likely to be immortality, engineered happiness, and something close to godlike power over our own biology. Before we can evaluate whether that is wise, we first have to notice that the agenda has already started to shift.
Start by pulling out a notebook tonight and listing the five things you worry about most, then holding each one up against the numbers Harari cites, famine against obesity, plague against old age, war against suicide, and being honest about which category your fear actually belongs to. Once you've done that, pick one worry that turns out to be a holdover from an older, scarcer world, and consciously downgrade the energy you give it. Then look at where that freed-up attention could go instead, toward whatever genuinely threatens your health, your relationships or your sense of purpose today. Finally, choose one area of ambition, money, achievement, comfort, where you decide in advance what enough looks like, so success stops quietly demanding more of you than it needs to.
What You'll Achieve
You come away able to separate genuine present-day risk from inherited historical anxiety, and you redirect effort toward problems that actually match the world you live in now, rather than the world your instincts still assume.
Redirect your attention to today's real risks
Audit your worry list against the numbers
Write down your top five recurring fears. Check whether they belong to the world of scarcity and violence, or to a different world entirely, the one where overeating, old age and self-inflicted harm are now the bigger threats.
Ask what fills the vacuum for you personally
If your basic survival is no longer genuinely in question, name honestly what you are actually chasing instead, whether that is status, comfort, meaning, or simply more of what you already have.
Define enough on purpose
Since Harari notes that achievement tends to breed craving rather than satisfaction, pick one area of your life and set a deliberate ceiling, a point at which you decide you have arrived, rather than letting the goalposts drift automatically.
Reflection Questions
- Which of your current worries would have made sense to someone living in 1694, and which would have made no sense to them at all?
- Where in your life are you still guarding against a danger that has largely receded?
- If scarcity is no longer your main constraint, what actually is?
- What would you do with your time and resources if you stopped treating survival as the main project?
Personalization Tips
- A parent who polices sugar out of fear of scarcity might notice their real risk is overabundance, not shortage.
- A manager who still budgets for last decade's crisis might redirect planning toward the risks actually facing the team now.
- Someone who equates safety with having more savings might ask what specific new worry that extra cushion is meant to solve.
Homo Deus: A History of Tomorrow
Ready to Take Action?
Get the Mentorist app and turn insights like these into daily habits.