Find the bottleneck before you work harder to move faster
A small software team kept missing release dates. They worked late, added standups, and bought more monitors, but nothing changed. A new lead asked them to map the process on one whiteboard. From ticket creation to deploy, they drew every step and circled delays. The slowest point wasn’t coding speed. It was approval for minor UI changes, which sat in a manager’s queue for days.
They ran a one-week experiment. For low-risk UI tweaks, they piloted a lightweight checklist where two senior engineers approved each other. They tracked cycle time and bugs. Lead time dropped by 30% with no increase in defects. Throughput jumped, morale lifted, and the manager’s inbox shrank. The next week they discovered a second constraint: inconsistent QA environments. One Docker fix shaved another day.
The team laughed about how long they’d tried to “work harder” in the wrong place. They stopped glorifying late nights and started celebrating smoother flow. A sticky-note on the wall read, “Find the bottleneck first.” Coffee breaks sounded different now—more curious, less resigned. A designer joked, “We didn’t need more hours. We needed fewer blockers.”
This is the essence of constraint thinking. In any system, one factor limits the speed of results. Fixing that factor unlocks more progress than pushing everywhere. It’s a practical version of the Theory of Constraints: identify the bottleneck, exploit it (make it productive), subordinate other steps to it, and elevate it if needed. Then look for the next bottleneck. Measure throughput, not motion.
Sketch your process from start to finish and mark delays or rework, then ask what single factor truly limits speed or quality. Choose one suspected constraint and run a one-week experiment that changes only that element while you measure throughput—completed units, lead time, or error rate. If results improve, standardize and amplify the fix; if not, move to the next bottleneck and test again. Start mapping your current workflow on a single page before your next work session.
What You'll Achieve
Shift from working harder to working on the right spot, increasing throughput and quality while reducing overtime and frustration.
Map, test, and fix the true constraint
Map the workflow end‑to‑end
List each step from start to finish and who owns it. Look for queues, rework, and delays.
Ask constraint questions
What single factor limits the speed or quality of results? Is it skill, policy, resource, decision, or an external dependency?
Run a small experiment
Change one suspected constraint—pricing, approval order, missing template—for a week. Keep everything else constant.
Measure throughput, not busyness
Track completed units, lead time, or error rate, not hours worked. If throughput improves, amplify the fix; if not, test the next constraint.
Reflection Questions
- Where does work actually wait in your process, and why?
- What metric best represents real throughput for this work?
- What small, reversible experiment could you run this week?
- How will you prevent busyness metrics from masking true progress?
Personalization Tips
- Nonprofit: Donations lag because receipts take two weeks; fixing the receipt template speeds thank‑yous and boosts repeat gifts.
- Home: Morning chaos is caused by missing lunch prep; packing the night before cuts exit time by ten minutes.
Eat That Frog!: 21 Great Ways to Stop Procrastinating and Get More Done in Less Time
Ready to Take Action?
Get the Mentorist app and turn insights like these into daily habits.