Why 'Skill-Will' Alignment Is Hard but Essential—The Science Behind Perfect Hires
It’s easy to be dazzled by someone’s resume or to be carried away by their enthusiasm in an interview. But true hiring success demands something tougher: pinpointing both their capacity to achieve (skill) and their motivation to do so in your unique culture (will). The 'skill-will bull’s-eye' is that special zone where the candidate has a proven record of delivering exactly your required outcomes and has the passion, energy, and value alignment to thrive in your organization.
Many managers fall into the trap of hiring 'the best available' by skill, thinking their will or attitude can be fixed later—or vice versa. The reality? People rarely change their core motivation, and even the most skilled individual struggles if uninspired or misaligned. Behavioral research confirms that long-term high performance comes when both skill and motivation line up closely with the demands and spirit of the role.
This kind of rigorous assessment might feel like extra work, but it's the only way to consistently avoid costly misfires and ensure lasting, positive impact.
After interviews, score every serious candidate separately on skill and will for each important outcome. If a person falls short on either one, don’t compromise—move on, even if it means waiting longer. Make your decision on evidence from interviews and references, not just an impression. Keeping these standards high is demanding, but it’s how you create an unstoppable, harmonious team. If you try this with your next hire, you’ll see the difference immediately.
What You'll Achieve
Increase hiring success and long-term engagement by strictly seeking candidates who both can and want to excel in your unique environment.
Rate Candidates Separately on Ability and Motivation
After interviewing, rate skill and will for each outcome.
Consider separately if the candidate can deliver the results (skills/track record) and if they are truly motivated and a cultural fit (will for the mission, outcomes, and competencies).
Only advance true bull’s-eye matches.
Move forward only with candidates who rate an 'A' on both skill and will for all critical outcomes—settling for 'just good enough' rarely works long-term.
Use evidence, not instinct, in assessment.
Base your ratings on structured interviews and references, not on hunches or charisma.
Reflection Questions
- Where have you compromised on skill or will—and what were the results?
- How confident are you in your ability to judge motivation fairly during interviews?
- What’s the cost of waiting for a bull’s-eye match versus settling for 'almost'?
Personalization Tips
- A volunteer committee selects chairpeople by weighing both their ability to lead and their excitement for the project, instead of just picking whoever volunteers first.
- A coach picks team captains who show both match-winning skill and relentless drive at practice—not just one or the other.
Who: The A Method for Hiring
Ready to Take Action?
Get the Mentorist app and turn insights like these into daily habits.